Analysis | Why China’s Developers Are Facing Mortgage Boycotts


China’s real estate crisis continues to spiral as some would-be home owners refuse to pay mortgages because cash-strapped developers have yet to finish their properties. The wildcat boycotts spread at one point in mid-July to over 300 housing projects in about 90 cities, with loans up to 2 trillion yuan ($295 billion) under threat. That has prompted the authorities to respond with promises of stricter regulation of presales — a popular way to buy a home or apartment in China, in which buyers have to start repaying their loans even on projects that are still under construction. The boycotts are politically sensitive in a year when the ruling Communist Party wants stability ahead of an all-important gathering later this year where President Xi Jinping is expected to get anointed for a third term. They also pose a risk to the broader housing market by keeping potential buyers on the sidelines.

1. How much does real estate matter to China’s economy?

A lot: Construction and property sales have been the biggest engines of economic growth since Xi came to office a decade ago. Home prices skyrocketed — surging sixfold over the past 15 years — as an emerging middle class flocked to property as one of the few safe investments available. The boom led to speculative buying as new homes were pre-sold by property developers who turned more and more to international investors for funds. So when Chinese officials ratcheted up steps to reduce the risk of a bubble and temper the inequality that unaffordable housing can create, it touched off a cash-flow crisis that has sent some major developers into default. A sales slump that began during the pandemic was deepened by aggressive measures to contain Covid-19. So far, the state’s intervention has held off a disorderly collapse of the property market that could undermine the financial system and jolt the world economy too. 

2. What fueled the real estate boom?

In 1998, when China created a nationwide housing market after tightly restricting private sales for decades, only a third of its people lived in towns and cities. Now almost two-thirds do, increasing the urban population by 480 million. The property sector also expanded rapidly, while struggling to keep up. Boom cities such as Shenzhen became less affordable based on price-to-income ratios than London or New York, frustrating a generation of would-be buyers. Local and regional authorities, which rely on sales of public land for a hefty chunk of their revenue, encouraged more development, which also helped meet the central government’s ambitious annual targets for economic growth, which often hit double digits. Debt piled up as builders rushed to meet demand. Annual sales of dollar-denominated offshore bonds — meaning those sold mainly to foreign investors — surged from $675 million in 2009 to $64.7 billion in 2020, leading to a swelling interest burden. Developers had some $207 billion in dollar-denominated bonds outstanding as of late last year, accounting for about one-quarter of the total from all Chinese borrowers. Additional, opaque liabilities make it hard to assess true credit risks.

3. What did the government do?

It has for years tried to defuse the debt bomb amid fears an explosion could set off a disastrous financial meltdown. In mid-2020, it began to squeeze new financing to real estate developers to try to reduce the threat, and asked banks to slow the pace of mortgage lending. New borrowing metrics introduced for developers proved to be a game changer. Called the “three red lines” by state-run media, they aimed to reduce reckless borrowing by setting thresholds for a developer’s liabilities, debt and cash holdings. Annual borrowing would be capped based on how many parameters were met.

4. What happened to the developers?

Those that didn’t have enough cash on hand to cover their liabilities found themselves in a bind. At least 18 defaulted on offshore bonds after the crackdown began. China Evergrande Group, once the country’s biggest developer, was labeled a defaulter for the first time in December after it missed payments on several bonds. The establishment of a “risk management committee” dominated by provincial officials was quickly announced for the firm to stave off a complete collapse. (Bondholders still were left wondering how much they would collect once the dust settles.) Others, including Kaisa Group Holdings Ltd. and Sunac China Holdings Ltd., followed. Fears of further contagion have reverberated throughout the industry and the wider economy, hammering domestic growth, weakening consumer confidence and roiling global markets that have long assumed China’s real estate titans would be bailed out by the government.

5. Where does this leave the industry?

In a deep slump. Combined sales at the top 100 developers halved in the first four months of this year compared with last. Property loan growth slowed to the weakest pace in over two decades at the end of March. Construction fell 14% in 2021 from the previous year, the biggest fall in six years. All this matters a lot because in China, the real estate sector accounts for almost a quarter of gross domestic product, when nonresidential construction, building materials and related activity such as real estate services are included.  

Across China millions of square feet of unfinished apartments have been left to gather dust as a result of developers facing cash-flow problems — economists at Nomura International HK Ltd estimated in mid-July that Chinese developers have delivered only about 60% of the homes they presold from 2013 to 2020. The mortgage protests hit just as the market was showing signs of stabilizing, with sales picking up June. The chairman of one of the biggest developers said the market had bottomed out. A full-bore crisis could leave millions more homebuyers who put up money in advance in limbo. (Buyer protections commonly used abroad, such as escrow accounts and installment payments, have tended to be weak.) Home prices began to fall last September for the first time in six years. Fire sales would further pummel the market, squeezing other developers and rippling through related industries and suppliers. The risk of popular unrest — more than 70% of urban China’s wealth is stored in housing — would rise, unsettling the government. A historic selloff in offshore bonds would spread to the much larger domestic credit market, spreading from lower-rated property companies to stronger peers and banks. Global investors would sell even more. 

7. How serious are the mortgage protests?

While they affect only a sliver of the lenders’ combined mortgage portfolios, the speed at which the protests grew took many by surprise. (Tracking the extent grew more difficult after China began censoring crowd-sourced online tallies in mid-July.) Financial regulators responded by urging banks to boost lending to builders to help finish the projects, and a grace period on payments for some homebuyers was said to be under consideration. In a scenario analysis released July 22, Bloomberg Intelligence estimated between 1.8% and 6.5% of China’s total mortgages could be exposed.

The government has tweaked some rules to try to stabilize the situation. For example the central bank stepped up its support for several distressed developers and banks were instructed to ensure growth in both residential mortgages and loans to developers in some areas. Above all, avoiding a “Lehman moment” — when the failure of the US bank in 2008 sent shock waves through global markets — is a priority ahead of this year’s Communist Party congress, where Xi is expected to be handed a third term. That political necessity most likely means the government will try to contain the crisis, at least for the near term. 

More stories like this are available on

Source link

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *